Category: Blog

How To Manage Increase In Labour Cost

How To Manage Increase In Labour Cost

The inflation is on rising day by day.  All the businesses are struggling to cope up with the increase in labor costs.  Labor cost is a critical cost element which accounts for the major cost of production.  Around the globe, the nations have legal regulations regarding minimum wages and other benefits which businesses are expected to follow without fail.  These cannot be reduced.  So, we have to look for other ways to reduce labor cost.  Read on to know the other ways:

Technology:  Automation is a one-time investment.  It is a permanent and problem free solution.  Hence find out which functions of your business can be automated.  The more human intervention is reduced, the more you can cut on labor costs.

Turnover:   When you try to cut on labor costs, the resulting labor turnover will increase the cost further.  Hence instead of measures like extended working hours, lowered compensation etc. try offering flexibility in timings with reduced incentives.  This will reduce turnover.

Performance-based pay:  Not all apps perform like the bitcoin code software.  The profit they earn for you is huge.  Similarly, not all workers add value to your company.  Then why pay the same salary to all?  This will result in huge labor costs.  Instead of offering fixed wages, offer more performance linked incentives and allowances.  This will reduce your labor costs.  The best performing resources will stay happy as they are rewarded more.

Cross training:  Over a period of time, employees continue to do the same work without learning new skills.  Due to this, during a shortage of labor due to absence, you may not be in a position to divert resources from one task to another.  Instead, you continue to recruit people in spite of having idle resources.  Cleverly shuffle the functions of people periodically so that everyone gets trained in all the tasks.  That way you need not to hire people.  Instead, you can optimize the existing labor resources.

Giving non-monetary benefits:  Instead of giving monetary packages more, compensate with non-monetary benefits like sponsoring free training, medical check-ups etc.  This is less costly.

Outsourcing:  Do not incur labor costs on taking up the non-core functions.  Instead simply outsource them.  That way your labor cost will be drastically lowered.

Reduce duplication and improve coordination:  Among various departments of your company check if the same task is done twice.  If so, eliminate duplication.  Only good coordination will ensure avoiding wastage of labor resources.

Use the above tips and reduce mounting labor costs in your business.

Types Of E-Commerce Payment System

Types Of E-Commerce Payment System

E-commerce is just arrived due to eh development of digital technology. E-commerce is nothing but purchasing products and services online. This is loved by almost all people as it is so simple to use and also it reduces the travel. This is the foremost predominant reason why the public chooses online shopping despite going for traditional shopping.

Are you the one among the online shopping lover?

Yes of course. Everything seems to be easy and quick in this shopping method and the most important thing is the payment. It allows the users to pay the amount using many different platforms and the audience can pay for the transactions they have with the folwing payment methods.

These are the valid reasons why people start dissipating traditional shopping and switch over to the latest technology based online shopping. Even the exchanges and returns can also be done very quickly but in traditional offline purchasing, the buyer has to roam here and there to exchange the goods.

Let us have a look at the amazing e-commerce payment platforms.

  1. Debit cards:

The debit card has become the familiar word among the people as we are all using it for almost all the things. We can pay with the debit cards for the online purchase just by saving the card details on the laptops, mobiles or something else. This is one of the easiest methods to pay the bills.

  1. Credit cards:

Many of us start using credit cards as it helps us to run our lives with perfect planning. But the only problem is we should be keenly watching the payment due date and once we fail to pay it then it may create several problems. So, use the credit cards for paying the online shopping bills and also the credit cards give us reward points based on our billed amount.

  1. E-wallet:

This is just a prepaid account anyone can have and can make use of it to pay the bills instantly. When the users have an amount in their e-wallet then they can transfer it for the billed amount. Even we can use the e-wallet money to deposit in an automated trading software like Bitcoin Code.

  1. Net banking:

Net banking is the one most of us are aware of. It reduces the unnecessary pressure of going to bank and withdraws or deposit money. The persons who would like to do net banking can create a login and password and start transferring funds from one account to another.

Netbanking reduces the precious time of the people especially the business magnets who are very busy with their works.


Side Businesses While Working Work Full Time

Side Businesses While Working Work Full Time

In this competitive world and the high cost of living, the salary we get is not at all enough to lead a normal basic life. So, we must search out some side businesses to earn more money. There are many businesses available in the market and we must choose a few from it which suits our skills and talents.

Let us have a look at those side businesses which we can do while working full time and this helps an infinite number of people who are running out of cash even though they are earning a monthly salary.

  1. Blogging:

Blogging is a hobby for many of us and we can even make this hobby a tool for earning some amount. We can do some excellent write-ups for a company or to some websites and they will pay you with some amount for it. But the most important thing in blogging is the writers must obey the writing rules and styles they have given.

  1. Online teaching:

Online teaching is the most trending job in recent times and the demand or online teacher is getting higher and higher. We will be paid for the hours we take and it is really a wonderful opportunity to increase our salary. Before joining a website, make sure that it is a trust-worthy site and never cheat the people because many websites are sucking the energy of the people but not ready to pay the salary.

  1. Beauty parlors:

The number of beauty parlors is getting increased in an enormous way and so this is the best time to start up your own beauty parlor. We can even put a staff to handle the customers on behalf of us and we can get a huge profit out of it and there is no doubt at all.

  1. Tailoring:

Tailoring is the best part-time jobs especially for ladies because usually, the womenfolk are very much interested in purchasing and wearing new clothes. The cost of stitching a single material is very high and so if we know to stitch clothes, then we can open up a shop and double up our monthly incomes.

  1. Online trading:

Trading is nothing much and it is so simple to do from home. Sign up in a trading software, deposit the amount as you like and start doing trading. But the only drawback here is it is so hard to predict the price changes of trades in the trading market. So, we must be very aware and alert about it to safeguard our deposited amount. We can even watch the news about the rates of trades and then proceed to do buying or purchasing trades.


How to find out a scam binary options robot

Trading is participating or taking part in the financial share markets to perform investing of buying or selling. When a trader wants to achieve success by yielding profit, he or she should approach trading as business. A trader initially should have a plan of what to trade and how to trade. The plan should be so easy and concise so that when it is handed over to another new trader, he or she will be able to execute it properly in an exact way. A successful trader should devote his or her time and effort so that they will succeed in it.

Styles of trading:

The trading profits can be achieved by buying low and selling high method. There are four styles of trading as listed below.

  • Position trading
  • Swing trading
  • Day trading
  • Scalp trading

How to find out a scam binary options robot:

There are many ways to find out the software is a scam or legit.

  1. Poor website design:

This is an important tip to make sure when you really want to trade a binary options robot. Because the scammers will not worry about the design of the web page as they never want to spend time and money on it. So, the design of the website is untrustworthy.

  1. No previous history:

There will be no history on the experience and success of the software. Their intention is just to make the traders fool.

There are many advantages and disadvantages in Bitcoin code currency. Let us take a close look at the advantages of bitcoins.

  1. Anonymous and private:

Bitcoin transactions are fully anonymous and private. Bitcoin transactions cannot be easily identified like the transactions in bank. It is very difficult to track the transactions. So, no one can hack our transaction details.

  1. Freedom for payment:

As there will be no bank at all, there will be no holidays or strike. Anyone can transfer bitcoins to any person in any part of the world. There will be no limit for payment.

  1. Minimal transaction fee:

The transaction fee is based on the priority of the person. If he wants the transaction to be done immediately, he has to pay a minimal transaction fee. Otherwise, there will be no transaction fee.

  1. Security:

Bitcoin transactions are much secured as there is no intermediary, so that no fraudulent chargebacks will occur.

Disadvantages of bitcoin trading:

Some of the disadvantages of bitcoin trading are connected with its digital and decentralized nature.

  1. Popularity:

Bitcoin trading is not suitable for the uneducated workers. So, it is accepted only by a very small number of users. Many people are not aware of this digital currencies. Only some businessmen is doing bitcoin trading.

  1. Volatility:

It is difficult to predict what will happen next since there are many factors that affect price volatility. The factors like supply and demand will change daily.

  1. Valuation problem:

There will be no one to guarantee bitcoin’s value as it is decentralized. So, this will make loss for many users when supply increases and demand decreases.

  1. Digital nature:

The users are forced to change the bitcoins into currency when they want to purchase somethings in physical stores since it is digital in nature. The users are not allowed to spend outside from the digital platforms.

  1. Fast:

Bitcoin transactions are so fast because there will be no bank transactions. Bitcoins transactions are like an email and it can be done within 10 -15 minutes.

  1. Create our own money:

We can produce bitcoins currency as central government prints their own money. This can be done by a process called “Mining”.

Future Home of Artist As Subject

The gallery will go live December 1, 2006

Call for entries, visual artists:

For an online exhibit of artist’s portraits of/by other artists. I’ll make a permanent home for it on my domain (here), with links to both subject and creator, and send out notices far and wide. It will go up December 1st, 2006.

Binance is a trading app. It provides the exchange required for trading digital currency of your choice. It is becoming bigger and bigger very soon with high volume of trades done every day and making trading run smoothly. The platform they are providing is very stable and the UI looks very attractive. Bitcoin Society App has good UI too.

Want to submit your painting, sketch or print of an artist? All I need is a digital image. The original stays with you, and all inquiries (including sales) go to you. Look around at your art pals, pick one and do a portrait of them. Or maybe you already have an old painting of a studio-mate hanging around. Here’s what I’m looking for:

– Submission received by Nov. 1, 2006 – no exceptions.

– Any (still) visual medium (including but not limited to painting, pastels, ink, pencil, etching, silk screen, monoprint, mosaics, collage, digital or photographic process) any style, but it has to (obviously) look good on a computer screen, and if it’s abstract you’re going to have to work a little harder to convince me.

– Portraits of contemporary visual artists only. Bonus points if the subject of your piece submits a portrait of you. These are NOT self-portraits!

– Maximum of three entries per artist will be accepted – pick your best ones. (Don’t send more, or I’ll delete them all.)

– Submit by email or snail mail, following these directions:

EMAIL submissions:
-Subject line of email should read: Portraits, Your Name
-Image file is jpg, no larger than 1.5mb (or 72dpi, 8” x 10”)
-Include contact info for submitting artist as well as subject artist (this contact information will be published)
-Include a few lines of text about the image – title (subject), medium, size of original, date, anything else you want to add (optional)
-Email to

SnailMAIL submissions:
-Burn image/s to a CD. Label CD with your name. (You will not get the CD back – I’ll destroy them all after the project is up.)
-Image file can be any format or size – bigger is better.
-Include printout of contact info for submitting-artist as well as subject-artist (this contact information will be published)
-Include printout of a few lines of text about the image – title (subject), medium, size of original, date, anything else you want to add (optional)
-Mail to Anna Conti, Portrait Project, 1426 – 41st Ave., San Francisco, CA 94122

John Wall

Although John has been doing nature photography in California for more than twenty years, he feels he has barely scratched the surface of the possibilities.

Experience is the best teacher that teaches us everything over time. We should never forget the lessons that the teacher taught us!

Especially in matters of finance, it’s important that you take those lessons as a base and grow from there. It’s been with so many people, that we had or have lost monies to unknown sources and people, by our sheer ignorance, at least most of us can relate to. Don’t lose your monies further but increase your income steadily and gain more confidence to lead your life.

Check out the Top 10 Binary Demo, there are many successful platforms that will give you the best income at a steady pace, genuinely. There are few fake ones too, that will give you nothing, but here we give you a list of genuine platforms that can be benefitting you.

You can start your journey is 3 simple and easy steps. Registration first, making an initial deposit and finally setting your preferences. You are now ready to receive returns as much 5k$, in a lower span of time.

His recent work seeks to explore more deeply a particular place as it changes throughout the seasons, and for practical purposes that means places close to home such as Mt. Tamalpais, Ocean Beach, Pt. Reyes, and the coastlines of San Mateo and Sonoma counties.

He likes to keep his equipment simple and light enough to be carried in a knapsack or backpack since all his work is done in the field. John is an old-school photographer who shoots with a manual-focus film camera that’s been on the market even longer than he’s been shooting in the Golden State — the august Nikon F3. He shoots color slide film, then scans the slides into digital format at 5400 dpi (resolution that smokes any digital 35mm camera), prepares them for printing on his computer, and makes his final prints on an archival inkjet printer.

For more photos,
check out John’s own web site:

Six artists will be exhibiting at
BigCrow studios during San Francisco Open Studios

October 21st and 22nd, 2006
11am – 6pm both days

1426 41st Avenue (near Judah) in the Sunset District of San Francisco

(check back later in the summer for images of our recent work)

MAP of our location, and other nearby studios from the 2005 event

Hazards of being short

By the time I got I got off the #1 California bus on Fillmore, there was river of people, heading uphill to the top of the jump. There were fake cable cars parked at the top and side streets, for VIP viewing. But the rest of us were jammed into the few feet between the buildings and the snow line. SFPD was trying for traffic control (cranky drivers were all over the neighborhood.) Lots of black-uniformed private security guys kept telling us to keep moving… how or where we were supposed to move, I don’t know, because it was more cozy than an out-bound streetcar at Van Ness station on a Thursday afternoon. All I could see were the backs of the people between me and the snow line. I kept sticking my camera up in the air and shooting blind, but never in time to catch a skier. Eventually I gave up and went in search of art and cold drinks. Not a good day to find art (actually, I think it was the neighborhood.) Now that Hespe has moved, I’m not sure Cow Hollow has a real art gallery. I finally ended up at Mario’s in North Beach, for those drinks.

Friday will be a better art day for sure – I have a few artist interviews lined up in the SOMA area. And later, I’ll be going to SFMOMA. Reports next week. Meanwhile, have a nice weekend.

permanent link to this entry

Story about the event, with lots of (better) photos at SFGate
September 29, 2005 (Thursday) Snow in San Francisco

I have a doctor’s appointment this morning, then I’m heading over to see the ski jump event on Fillmore Street. Yep, they dumped a bunch of snow on Fillmore Street (btwn Broadwway & Green) and somebody is going down it today (noon to 4pm)… catching air, with a view of Alcatraz. As long as I’m in the neighborhood, I’ll see if I can find any art action on Union Street. If not, I’m heading over to North Beach. Will let you know what I find.

permanent link to this entry

September 28, 2005 (Wednesday) This ‘n That

More about artists destroying their art (see yesterday’s post):

From Libby Rosof: “I totally agree that people recognize that art is like a piece of a person. As someone who has thrown away gobs of old art work, it has taken years for me and Roberta to get enough distance to do that comfortably. Some things, even though they were not successful from the start, still lingered in our basements, storage lockers, our studio.”

When it comes to trading you should know the practical steps involved in it that is if you want to multiple your trading actions it will be equal to high fees. Never put yourselves under pressure. Make sure you have all the minimum stuff and conditions necessary for taking the decision on whether to begin trading or not. If you are not ready wait for the next opportunity to arrive. Bitcoin Trader also helps in making decision.

From Mark Barry: “I’m a tosser for sure. If it’s not working or doesn’t hold up after a few years, out you go. Hear the family screaming in the back ground, “that was my favorite piece!”, who knew? I posted this in June.”

: – : – : – : – :

It’s the last few days of the San Francisco Cityscapes show at Newmark Gallery (251 Post) and the last few days of the Inner Sunset Art Walk (9th and Irving.)

: – : – : – : – :

And next week, in case you didn’t get enough vintage rock footage from Martin Scorsese this week, here’s more from local Rock author, Richie Unterberger:

“On Tuesday evening, October 4, from 7:00-9:00pm, I’ll be showing and discussing rare cool vintage film clips — mostly, though not exclusively, from the 1960s — in the basement of the Park branch of the San Francisco Library at 1833 Page Street. No deliberate tie-ins with my books (though there will be footage of some artists I’ve written about), just a mini-fest of great and sometimes bizarre rock film you’ll have a hard time seeing anywhere else. There will be no repeats of clips I’ve showed at past library events; this will feature entirely new material. Planned for the program is footage of the Beatles, the Beach Boys, James Brown, the Rolling Stones, Bob Dylan, Patti Smith, the Supremes, and more. The event is free to all.”

permanent link to this entry

September 27, 2005 (Tuesday) Artists destroying their work
Libby Rosof posted an incredible report (“Deus ex Machina”) on artist Rah Crawford’s destruction of his paintings. The artist did the deed in a gallery, in front of an audience, with a power saw. The deal was, the paintings could be “rescued” if someone bought them. Libby called Crawford the “P .T. Barnum of Philadelphia’s art world.”

Was it a fit of pique over lack of sales? A “you’ll be sorry now” suicide gesture? A ritual, completing the end of that cycle of paintings? Or a publicity stunt?

A few years ago I was tempted to burn a stack of old canvases in a big summer solstice bonfire. Friends and family were horrified and talked me out of it. But I still wanted the old paintings to move on. So I gave away many of them, and the rest I gessoed over and started new paintings. In rare instances I stretched new canvas over the old paintings (meaning there’s a hidden painting behind the visible one.)

At the time, I thought this was the second best solution (best being the bonfire.) But over time I’ve realized that they’re all good ways to convert the energy that went into those paintings. And that’s really what it’s about – keeping the energy moving. A huge stack of moldering, dust-accumulating canvases is a stagnant and depressing sight that soon begins to divert even more energy from creation to maintenance.

I asked some friends and I searched the web to see what I could find about artists destroying their work. Quite a bit, it turns out. I found about 60 mentions of this practice, and here’s roughly how it breaks down, in terms of reasons:

1. Not satisfied with the work – 30%
2. Depression & self-doubt – 26%
3. Lack of storage space or materials – 15%
4. Worries about persecution – 8%
5. Concern for legacy – 7%
6. Ritual – 5%
7. Other* – 9%
* To start over, to increase value of remaining works, to avoid seizure by creditors, and just plain crazy

David W. Sumner

News & Notes
New Images:
This month for my Recent Work, I selected four images shot during a recent anti-war protest here in San Francisco. It was an interesting situation that, as you can see from this month’s notes column, brought up a whole series of questions.
In other news: a small selection of my prints is on view through December at the Corner Cup. Amanda Janes runs the Corner Cup at the corner of 43rd Avenue and Lawton and invited me to exhibit some of my work there. It’s a great little space and a warm and friendly place to enjoy good coffee, view great art and get to know some really wonderful people.
December Notes:
San Francisco provides abundant opportunity to photograph unique or unusual scenes and events. There’s so much to choose from one has the luxury of leaving the camera in the bag and waiting for that perfect moment or set of circumstances to materialize. There are times, however, when those choices can be very hard to make.The images I chose for December’s Recent Work page illustrate the point. While the anti-war demonstration depicted was relatively tame, people were being arrested and I saw one photographer who was working for the organizers of the demonstration being roughed up by police officers. It was obvious the potential for confrontation was increasing. It took some time before I felt reasonably sure of avoiding a direct confrontation and took my camera from the bag.

I shot a total of 19 frames before putting the camera away. Several young men had begun taunting the police when I decided to stop shooting. I had no desire to be involved in a full blown police action, so I packed it up and headed for the the subway station.

I started asking myself why I stopped to shoot the pictures in the first place. No one pays me to shoot pictures. I’m not hired to photograph breaking news stories. Yet, I felt compelled to photograph this particular protest march. I actually felt that I should make the pictures, and that if I didn’t I would be neglecting some moral obligation to record the socially significant events of the time and place in which I live.

I grew up heavily influenced by the effects of photojournalism and television news. I remember the days on which the Kennedys and Martin Luther King were assassinated, and I remember watching the Vietnam War brought home through intensive television coverage. Those images, in large part, shaped my social consciousness.

I’m never without a camera, but I don’t leave the house each morning intent on finding a story. I’m simply prepared to take pictures. But if I do come across a story it’s not easy to simply say, “That’s not the kind of thing I shoot.” It’s not easy to just walk away. It becomes one of those difficult choices. A choice that one way or another has to be made.

November Notes:
From 1998 to 2001 I worked in the photography industry in one capacity or another. Early on, my goal was to start a freelance business shooting editorial assignments. To that end I spent about four years working as a photo researcher and studio assistant for other photographers. I learned a lot about the business and came to realize that “success” in the business didn’t always require creating superior imagery. As with everything else, “politics” often determines “success.” Of course that led to a serious questioning of my understanding of success.

When I quit working for other photographers and ventured into the arena of freelance work, it soon became clear to me that shooting assignments wasn’t necessarily the way I wanted to be making images. For a few years I worked shooting images for a variety of magazines devoted to bicycling. It was a subject I was interested in and an activity in which I participated. I thought the match would be perfect. To a certain degree it was, but I wasn’t making a living. I was accumulating a sizable file of stock images that didn’t really excite me or satisfy my need to make compelling images. I gradually returned to shooting the type of subject matter that genuinely moved me and also to shooting black and white film.

An assignment shot for Bicycling Magazine, published in 1991.

Trying to make a living at editorial photography actually got in the way of doing photography. So did most the other jobs I was able to find within the industry. Once I found a way to make a living in a pleasant and creatively inspiring environment my photography blossomed. My work became technically better, more of my personal vision and thus style came through in my images, and I began enjoying photographing more than ever. I had finally reached a point of no return: I can never stop making photographs, there is no question about that now.

I may never again try to make my living from my creative work. The point is that I will never stop doing my work. There will never be a time, during the rest of my life, when I won’t be pursuing my creative work. There will never be a time when I won’t be a photographer.


September Notes:
On August 26th I made my third photographic trip to Alcatraz, this time with photographer John Wall. I expected to shoot a few exteriors I had neglected on the previous trips and thus wrap up this little project. But as John and I explored the ruins, away from the areas crowded with tourists, I realized I was only now beginning to feel the place.

As my friend Dan Unger, a NPS ranger assigned to Alcatraz, led John and me through the 1940’s industries building, it became obvious that I had spent enough time looking and that I was now beginning to see. This project is just beginning, there is so much more to do.

I don’t want to guess at how many more trips to the island I will make before I feel I have completed the project. Nor do I want to speculate on the final outcome. But I am compelled to keep looking at and photographing this mesmerizing ruin of one of our society’s darkest institutions.

August Notes:
As a photographer I often find myself in a situation I’m sure is familiar to most serious photographers: A friend, acquaintance, or otherwise interested individual is looking at one of my portfolios, the prints exhibited in my studio, or a stack of freshly printed images, and I just know that statement is rolling around in their mind, making its way to the tip of their tongue: “These pictures are beautiful, you must use a really good camera.”

My wife is a painter. No one has ever said to her, “Your paintings are beautiful, you must use really good brushes.” Do writers get this: “That novel you wrote is just wonderful, you must use a really good typewriter”? Have you ever been to a dinner party and enjoyed the meal so much that you felt compelled to compliment the cook on the quality of their stove? Think about it: How many people believe that by simply sitting down at a Steinway they will be able to play like Glenn Gould? Yet there are thousands of people who believe that spending thousands of dollars on a Leica will make them great photographer. Why is that?

A camera is a light-tight box that holds a piece of film in place behind a curtain. The shutter is the mechanism that opens and closes the curtain in a fraction of a second thus exposing the film to light. That’s all a camera can do. It doesn’t matter if the light-tight box is a Leica, a Nikon, a Minolta or a Quaker Oats carton. It doesn’t matter if the light-tight box is totally mechanical, electronic, computerized and fully automatic. They are all doing the same thing: holding a piece of film in place behind a curtain then opening and closing the curtain in a fraction of a second exposing the film to light. That’s all any camera can do.

No piece of equipment, no matter how precisely manufactured, has ever been responsible for making a great photograph. To paraphrase a quote from one of Eddie Adams’ mentors: “Cameras don’t make photographs. People make photographs.” If I make a good photograph it’s because I’m being a good photographer, not because I’m using a Leica M4-2. If I make a great photograph it’s because when I released the shutter I was experiencing a great moment as a photographer. And I experienced that great moment because practice as a photographer has trained my vision to anticipate and recognize that great moment so that I’m releasing the shutter and exposing my film at precisely the instant that moment unfolds.

So, I guess that’s the answer: Cameras don’t make photographs. Practice and dedication to photography makes good photographs.


July Notes:
My first serious experience in photography was with black and white film. Reading books, I taught myself how to develop film. I bought a Bessler enlarger and taught myself how to make prints.

In the 1980’s, when I had hopes of a successful career in commercial and editorial photography, I shot color almost exclusively: Fujichrome 50 Professional then Fuji Velvia. As those career hopes diminished, I gradually returned to the ‘wonderful world’ of black and white.

The more I worked the more I came to realize that my true vision would never have emerged in color. My natural and most honest vision will always be found in black and white.

If you want to define cryptocurrency in simple words keeping aside the fact that it is a replacement for other currency and payment types, it is nothing but just few database entered in a limited manner which cannot be changed by anyone until and unless some conditions that are specific are fulfilled. Crypto Code is a software that will help in trading such currencies.

I occasionally return to the question of color vs. black and white and while I greatly enjoy many fine color images, I always end up on the black and white side of the debate.

The presence of color provides so much familiar information that one often assumes to completely understand the image at a glance. Black and white focuses one’s attention on the essence of the image, its truest subject. It forces one to actually spend a little time studying the image, to be able to see what’s in it.

Some years ago I came across an article on Bernice Abbott in an issue of American Photographer. In it she is credited with saying that color too often gets in the way of the image. I generally agree with that idea, and in my own work I find that to absolutely be the case. On the other hand, color can be a very vital tool if one thinks of color in the same way a painter thinks about and uses color.

The most powerful, dynamic and often most successful color photographs are those in which color is as much the subject of the image as is the object being photographed.

Consider the work of the following photographers:

PeteTurner –

Jay Maisel –

Eric Meola –

Art Kane –

Every now and then I hear about a new color film being released and I get that familiar twinge of excitement I often experienced twenty years ago when every new product release by a film manufacturer made every die-hard Kodachrome user cringe. From time to time I’ll have a little fun shooting a roll of color, but so often when I ‘m going through the proofs I’ll find myself looking at an image and wishing I’d shot it in black and white. I can find inspiration in the work of Pete Turner or Jay Maisel, but the most I could do would be to copy them. The uniqueness of my work, how ever subtle it may be, will only exist as various percentages of gray.

JULY 2005

July 29, 2005 (Friday) – Extra! Extra!

Someone has taken Adele Shaw’s Bikini Top without her permission.

It happened last night, 7/27. From its location on 19th Ave between Font and Holloway – next to SF State University.

If you see it or have word please let her know -it probably wouldn’t fit anyone else, anyway.

Hopefully whoever took it has a sense of humor and will do something interesting with it…
but she wants it back!

Please pass this on to anyone who might know something.

permanent link to this entry

July 29, 2005 (Friday) – di Rosa Collection of Contemporary California Art.

Contemporary art is known as ‘the art of today.’ It was first made in the late 20th century and early 21st century. They work on transforming issues that have influenced globally, different cultures and world has advancement in technology. The art made by them consists of materials, concepts and subjects which are out of traditional boundary. Trader VC also consists of combination of different things.

Tyler Green started a list of “really good, but less-considered, art museums that are nowhere near Fifth Avenue”, which made me think about the the di Rosa:

This is not flyover country, and it’s not technically a museum (it’s a collection) but the Di Rosa Collection of Contemporary California Art has got to be on the top ten list of most-overlooked art viewing spaces in the country. It’s one of my favorite art viewing spaces, but its inaccessibility means I only see it once every couple of years.

At some point after I moved to San Francisco, I noticed that almost all of my favorite stuff in local museums was on loan from the same guy – Rene di Rosa. So when I found out he was opening his collection to the public, I had to see it.

He basically opened up his home, which is an old stone winery built in 1886 (he moved into another building somewhere else on the property.) The collection is housed in several art buildings alongside a private lake. Some of the buildings are converted farm buildings, and the others are built to be used as galleries, but they look like tractor barns, and silos, etc.

It’s an absolutely astounding collection. Not only the sheer number of artworks, but the fact that most of it is by contemporary, Northern California artists (artists you’re familiar with, but whose work you only see once in a great while) plus the idiosyncratic curating, make this an unforgettable experience. There are no labels, wall tags, or curator’s text plaques in the galleries. Rene di Rosa says that, “talking about art is like trying to French kiss over the telephone. The point is that words can and do get in the way. They distract more than they illuminate. Knowing who did it when and the title can be interesting on some level. But wall labels do not reveal the work and can be insistent distractions. People bring their own baggage to the viewing experience. We invite them to open that baggage and participate in the conversation between themselves and the art. I believe the absence of labels is empowering. It makes some people nervous, but most enjoy the vacation.”

Rene di Rosa has eclectic tastes, but I think it’s fair to say he favors funky, conceptual, colorful, funny, thoughtful work that displays strong craftsmanship. The property is dotted with glass houses, ceramic preachers, cars hanging from trees, giant polychromed figures lounging about under the trees, cows on water, and of course drawing, painting, photography, installations, sculpture, kinetic sculpture, earth works, art cars, an underground cathedral and a large flock of peafowl.

Some of the (more than 900) artists represented in his collection are Terry Allen, Robert Arneson, Anthony Aziz, Clayton Bailey, James Barsness, David Best, Elmer Bischoff, Sandow Birk, Chris Brown, Joan Brown, Deborah Butterfield, Squeak Carnwath, Enrique Chagoya, Bruce Conner, Jay Defeo, Roy De Forest, Mark Di Suvero, Viola Frey, Wally Hedrick, Mildred Howard, Robert Hudson, David Ireland, Jess, Paul Kos, Manuel Neri, Nathan Olivera, Mel Ramos, Rigo, Scott Siedman, James Weeks, William T. Wiley… and he has multiple examples of works by these artists.

I should really make more of an effort to get there at least once year. But it IS an effort, especially without a car. It’s in the Carneros region, just south Napa & Sonoma, about 1.5 hours drive from San Francisco. It’s really in the boonies. And it takes at least two days to see it all, because you have to make reservations to get beyond the gatehouse gallery and you can only make reservations for the galleries OR the grounds (not both.) I’ve never gone for the grounds tour, because it would kill me to go all the way up there and not be able to see the big gallery. I’ve made do with glimpses of the grounds from traveling between the gallery buildings. Whichever tour you choose, it’s about 2 hours long, and then you have to drive quite a few miles to find something to drink or eat. (My advice: pack a lunch.)

Rene di Rosa quote and images from “Local Color” (a book about the collection – ISBN 0-8118-2377-6) and from di Rosa promotional brochure.

permanent link to this entry

July 28, 2005 (Thursday) – Sacramento Valley Landscape Exhibit

The following review was written by Central Valley artist, Ramona Soto:

I want to tell you about the Sacramento Valley Landscape Exhibition at the John Natsoulas Gallery in Davis, but first I need to explain a little about landscape art here.

As you can imagine, the Sacramento Valley provides a special challenge to the landscape artist. There are few “built-in” spectacular scenes such as those clamoring for attention in the Bay Area. The valley is essentially, well, FLAT. So artists come to see the valley floor as a canvas in itself. The landscape’s moods are widely changeable; the weather, the water, and the growing things vary greatly from season to season. Every variation is capitalized upon.

The summer brings the sun as an all-pervading force, providing hot, dry days, long, warm evenings, increased activity along the deep blue rivers, the patchwork patterns of crops, and trees in full leaf. In the autumn, the effect of the sun is less intense. Workers and their machines begin to harvest the crops, turning the fields back to brown, and leaves turn an astounding array of colors before falling into fiery piles that carpet whole neighborhoods. As autumn stretches on toward winter, spectacular thunderstorms start rolling through the valley, causing eerily bright sun rays to shoot beneath vast black cloudscapes.

With winter, the landscape becomes sketchy: the whole season needs nothing more than pencil, charcoal, and ink to express it. Tule fog blankets the valley floor in the late night and early morning. Fields are fallow. Skeletal trees provide little shelter from the cold and rain. Rivers run rough and gray. Finally, in the spring the landscape begins to wake again to soft greenness, plentiful water, and warmth.

It’s against this backdrop that you’ll be able to enjoy the full flavor of the landscape exhibit at the Natsoulas Gallery.

The exhibit covers over 100 years of landscape art, from a few small chromo-lithographs and watercolors of valley scenes from the 1800s and early 1900s, through a couple of small Maynard Dixons from the early 1920s, to many large and small contemporary paintings – one of which was completed just this past week at the Landscape Conference.

One of the artists featured is Anne Hysell, a pastelist who who creates very large landscapes in small (5″x15″, 9″x20″) horizontal formats. She also presents, in a larger format, a beautiful, shadowed world of leafy trees interspersed with paths of light.

A few years ago Wayne Thiebaud began painting aerial views in his prismatic style, rising up above the landscape until the horizon appears less than an inch from the top of the canvas and the pattern of the fields and waterways is revealed below. One of these paintings (“Brown River” – at right) appears here on the first floor, brilliantly grouped with the two Maynard Dixons and works by Deladier Almeida and Gary Ernest Smith, who show the influence of the older artists – as does the work of Phil Gross.

Gregory Kondos is represented by a colorful, buttery riverscape in his signature style. Patrick Dullanty’s paintings show the influence of people on the landscape (“Cutter Industrial”), as do many of Boyd Gavin’s gorgeous paintings of late afternoon light on buildings, silos, and trucks.

Pat Mahoney’s landscapes have a distinctive style. The colors she uses are rather acidic; she makes use of dark greens and oranges, and the dark colors of the land are repeated in splotches in the light sky, almost giving the appearance that the atmosphere has caught fire. As unusual as this style is, after seeing quite a few of these, I began to want to see her do greater variations on the themeor else begin another theme.

D.A. Bishop’s “Waterpipe” and “Knoll” are two of my favorites, though it’s hard to say exactly why. At first glance, “Waterpipe” seems like a typical, traditional valley landscape of a field with a pipe emptying out into a stream. But for some reason I was immediately drawn to it, utterly fascinated with what? the composition? the technique? the idea that Bishop noticed this totally ordinary, unremarkable scene in the first place, and considered it worthy of recording? It’s a wonderful painting.

Besides the featured exhibit, the Natsoulas Gallery itself is irresistible: four floors, plus the roof… and the stairway walls are COVERED with art. (Just in the stairway between the second and third floors, I counted 47 pieces.) The owner, John Natsoulas, is welcoming and is very supportive of the arts community.

Sacramento Valley Landscape Exhibition
July 6 – August 21, 2005
John Natsoulas Gallery
521 First Street, Davis, CA

Images (top to bottom):
“Haystacks” by Gregory Kondos
“Baled” by Gary Ernest Smith
“Coming and Going” by Phil Gross
“Brown River” by Wayne Thiebaud
painting by D.A.Bishop
“River Life” by Gregory Kondos
(images link to sources)

permanent link to this entry

July 27, 2005 (Wednesday) – Misc Stuff…

Dropped off the rest of my paintings at the gallery today (for the Aug/Sept show.) This is a huge, huge, HUGE load off my mind. Now if I can just wrap up this slideshow/talk preparation, I will be able to focus my full attention on a wonderful portrait commission that I would like to finish in time to enter the National Portrait Competition. It’s a person I’ve painted before, someone who already owns a few of my paintings, and she called me the very day I first heard about this competition. So I figured it was kismet, and I’d better do it.

After I got back from the gallery today, I did a major overhaul of the sidebar (see –>). Links are now organized alphabetically (more or less) within categories and the categories have changed to reflect blog authors’ POV (as I understand it.)

permanent link to this entry

July 26, 2005 (Tuesday) – Listening
Ever since I started recording interviews with artists, little genies have been buzzing around me, whispering, “pod cast”, “web cast”, “mp3”, “Quicktime”, “downloadable”, and so forth. But take my word for it, you would NOT want to listen to the quick and dirty recordings I’ve been making. Lots of ambient noises, scritches, pops and a prolonged “sszzs” sound on every pronunciation of “s,” giving everyone a serious lisp. Still, transcribing those recordings is a major, time-consuming pain in the patootie. And I DO have the technical capability for making a decent recording, if I just paid attention and made more of an effort to get a clean sound. So I can foresee a possible podcast offering in this blog’s future.

Meanwhile, how do the other art podcasters sound? Chris at ZekesGallery reviewed a bunch of them last Monday. Plus he emailed me about the 17Reasons podcasts of local (SF) art shows and artists – these were good quailty, and interesting – I’ll download more, even though I’m probably the last person in San Francisco who lacks a cell phone and high speed internet access. Guy Diehl emailed me about Franklin McMahon’s Media Artist Secrets. I wasn’t that impressed with Media Artist Secrets, but Guy said, “There is a lot of information starting from episode #1 that makes you look at what you’re doing right and certainly what you’re doing wrong. The key here, like any information, is to glean what is useful and apply it to your benefit.”

Image from

permanent link to this entry

July 25, 2005 (Monday) – Alice Neel and Chain Link Fences

I spent quite a few hours this weekend, with Larry Morace, working on our upcoming slide show / artists’ talk (Sept. 1st – email Newmark for info.) One of the topics we’re touching on is how other artists have influenced us. It was tough to choose just a few. We kept thinking of more and more artists we wanted to include. It was when we had to explain how a particular artist influenced our work, in what specific way, that we started editing the list down again.

It occurred to me that there’s a difference between inspiration and influence. The artist that has inspired me the most, without a doubt, is Alice Neel. But I can’t honestly claim to see any influence from her in my work. Mainly because I can’t figure out how she did it. I am stunned, awed, amazed, and envious when I look at her paintings, but I don’t even have a clue how to do that kind of expressive clarity. On the other hand, artists like Hopper and Bechtle have had such a deep effect on my way of seeing that there probably isn’t a single painting of mine that doesn’t reflect that in some way. Then there are the artists who give you the mini master class when you see their work on a quiet day, alone in the museum…

A few years ago I’d been struggling with how to paint chain link fences. They’re a common sight in the city, and frequently show up in scenes I’d consider painting. But they’re tough to paint. When I tried, they always came out too meticulous, or too messy. I started looking to see how other cityscape painters handled the problem. The predominant solution seemed to be avoidance. That was my solution, too. Until I saw a show by James Doolin. He’d nailed it! He used careful, measured, isolated strokes for each bend of the wire, but there was lots of empty space around each one, to let the background come through. It created the illusion of that barrier that you don’t really see. I studied those paintings repeatedly, and then went back to the studio, psyched to try it for myself. It worked, and now that’s one more thing I don’t have to worry about when working on a composition.

upper left: “Ellen Johnson” by Alice Neel, from “Alice Neel: Women” ISBN 0-8478-2480-2
lower right: “Form vs. Content” by James Doolin, from “Urban Invasions” ISBN 0-938175-23-8

permanent link to this entry

July 22, 2005 (Friday) – On schedule
I’m heading downtown today, to get the last two paintings shot at Almac. Then I’ll walk over to the gallery to drop them off, and pick up some more postcards. I might actually be able to go visit some downtown art spots for the first time in two months. There’s still a lot of fiddly things to do here, like address & mail these cards, and tweak the slideshow for the next artist’s talk, but the hard stuff is done. Vince Romaniello has a show coming up, too – he says he’s “still painting but less so since I started all the fun things like framing, placing ads, shooting the work etc.”

Getting ready for a show is a weird process for a person who works alone and generally prefers solitude. Toby Judith Klayman (in her “Artists’ Survival Manual”) compares a show to a wedding:

Like weddings in general, shows are seldom easy or problem free. There are dozens of questions, doubts, and fears: will the “marriage” succeed? what is the relationship between and artist and those who see and collect the work? How do you make a public statement about what is essentially a very private, very personal endeavor – your artwork? And there are also dozens of arrangements to make – a slew of discussions and decisions and details to attend to.

So I’m off to attend to those details….

permanent link to this entry

July 21, 2005 (Thursday) – Jury Fees
Carole Es has a heart-felt and oh-so-true complaint about jury fees on her blog. I recommend that that you read the whole thing, but if you need some encouragement, here’s a few excerpts:

“if you’re going to start an arts organization or business, then you should be willing to look at art and weed out what you do and don’t want to exhibit. fund raise some other kind of way. why is funding your organization (that i may or may not be a participant in) my problem? sounds like your problem. as an artist, i got my own problems. believe you me.

a few non-profits are responding to the thread, justifying their reasons for charging fees to artists, posting their overhead, their rent and utility bills, etc. more of their problems. i have rent and bills too. what if

artists charged galleries to view their work? how is this more or less ridiculous?

my real advice is to use your 20 bucks more wisely. be as original with your self-promotion as you are with your art. you will have more successes the more you stay true to your ideas and morals. ”

permanent link to this entry

July 21, 2005 (Thursday) – Color
Last night I gave a lecture at the public library on the ways I use color in my paintings. Afterwards, a few people came up to me and asked me to post some of this info on my web site, so here it is:

The painter uses color for:

1. Mood, emotion

2. Composition:

a. contrast
b. depth
c. movement
d. unity / cohesion

3. Symbolism:

Cross-cultural color symbolism at
Good basic America color symbolism info at

My favorite color books, for the painter:

The Acrylic Painter’s Pocket Palette, by Ian Sidaway,
North Light Books, ISBN 0-89134-581-7

Color In Contemporary Painting, by Charles Le Clair,
Watson-Guptill, ISBN0-8230-0738-3

The Color Compendium, by Augustine Hope and Margaret Walch,
Van Nostrand Reinhold, ISBN 0-442-31845-6

permanent link to this entry

July 20, 2005 (Wednesday) – Can There Be Progress In Art?
Simon Caterson, an Australian writer, was inspired by a show of work by Dutch masters to wonder about, “the question of whether there can be anything like progress, much less continuity, in the arts.”

Some excerpts:

Simon Schama begins The Embarrassment of Riches, his history of 17th century Holland, with these words: “It is the peculiar genius of the Dutch to seem, at the same time, familiar and incomprehensible.” That duality could easily provide a basis for defining history itself. Culturally, technologically and geographically, we are far enough away from the world inhabited by the Dutch Masters that the parallels that might be drawn between their world and ours are provisional, to say the least.

Art’s preoccupations are often out of sync with the expectations of the wider society. At any given moment in cultural history, artists and movements may be considered ahead of their time or behind it, and their work may be in or out of fashion, neglected or overpraised. An artist like Turner is difficult to classify, since he was painting impressionistically some time before the Impressionist period officially began. One of Turner’s most celebrated paintings, Snow Storm – Steam Boat off a Harbour’s Mouth, was dismissed at the time of its unveiling as “soapsuds and whitewash”.

The English essayist William Hazlitt argued that it is wrong to apply the same progressive standards to art that are normally applied to the sciences. The analogy, he asserts, is false: “The arts hold immediate communication with nature, and are only derived from that source. When the original impulse no longer exists, when the inspiration of genius is fled, all the attempts to recall it are no better than tricks of galvanism to restore the dead to life.”

According to Hazlitt, if art were merely a matter of invention and refinement, then progress could be measured the same way that the development of other examples of human ingenuity can be traced: “What is mechanical, reducible to rule, or capable of demonstration, is progressive, and admits of gradual improvement; what is not mechanical or definite, but depends on genius, taste and feeling, very soon becomes retrograde, and loses more than it gains by transfusion.”

Science steadily builds on its discoveries, but the creative process is erratic, since the truths of human experience it seeks to capture are as elusive as they are universal and timeless. The means of expression has to change but the source material of art essentially never does. It is for that very reason that the Dutch Masters can speak to us with such clarity, and why art can remain meaningful long after the context in which it was produced has faded away.

In the West, the popular belief in human progress has, if anything, grown since Hazlitt’s day. In A Short History of Progress, historian Ronald Wright argues that “our practical faith in progress has ramified and hardened into an ideology – a secular religion that, like the religions that progress has challenged, is blind to certain flaws in its credentials”. Our society is geared to constant change, which is why the word reform is used so often by politicians and bureaucrats and why planned product obsolescence is such a vital part of our consumer society.

Excerted from “Raiders of the lost art”, by Simon Caterson, published July 16, 2005
Images: Upper – Vermeer, from; lower – Teo den Boon from Newmark Gallery

permanent link to this entry

July 19, 2005 (Tuesday) – Call For Entries: ISAW
San Francisco’s Inner Sunset Art Walk 2005 (ISAW)
July 18, 2005

Deadline: August 12, 2005 – The Inner Sunset Art Walk (ISAW) committee is now seeking submissions from artists interested in exhibiting in a very public and unique venue, the Inner Sunset Business District. This first ever event will be held from September 17th thru October 1st, 2005.

A juried process will be used to choose participating artists, and locate works. This exhibition event will take place in the public areas, windows and interior walls of participating Inner Sunset retailers.

In addition, exhibiting artists will be encouraged to take part in a neighborhood-wide open house and Art Walk on Thursday evening, September 22nd, and to attend a closing reception Saturday night, October 1st.

Entry Fee: free

Image Submission:
Please email your digital files (up to 5, .jpg format)
between now and August 12, 2005

This event is open to all local (Bay Area) artists. All work must be original.

Media and Specifications:
Work in two- and three-dimensional form is eligible. Two-dimensional work should not exceed 50?60×8 inches, including frame, and must be suitably framed in Plexiglas (when applicable), with hardware, ready to hang. Content should be family oriented, as the work will be shown in areas visible to the general public, including children. This is not a gallery exhibition.

Delivery and Installation:
Accepted works are to be delivered and installed by the artist, with cooperation by business owner on September 15th and 16th. Artwork will be taken down after Saturday October 1st, by prior arrangement with business owner.

Sales and Reproduction:
Sales will be handled by artists, with no commission taken by ISAW or the exhibiting businesses. ISAW reserves the right to photographically reproduce work for publicity and exhibition records.

August 12: Entries emailed after this date will not be accepted.
August 29: Notification of accepted work sent to artists.
September 15 – 16: Installation of accepted work by artists.
September 17: ISAW opens.
September 22: open house and Art Walk.
October 1: Closing Reception.
October 2 – 5: Artwork is uninstalled by artists.

Inner Sunset Merchants Association
Craig Dawson
1032 Irving Street, Suite 711
San Francisco, CA 94122
Phone: 415-665-1077

permanent link to this entry

July 15, 2005 (Monday) – Preshow Countdown Begins

Ahhh… the insanity of the last couple of weeks before a show… run over to Dick Blick for gaffer’s tape to wrap the canvas edges – they’re out. Great, now I have to go to Pearl, where I grab the last roll. Run by the gallery to pick up cards. Get stamps, update the mailing list, print labels, arrange for a car to get the paintings to the gallery… speaking of which, I still have to finish that last painting. I have maybe a day-and-a-half’s worth of work to do, so here I go…
permanent link to this entry

July 15, 2005 (Friday) – Another New Art Space
Receiver: another new gallery in the neighborhood – this one is in the Inner Sunset (1324 – 8th Ave. at Irving.) I was there last evening to meet with some other local artists and merchants, to talk about organizing a neighborhood art event in September. (More info about the art event in a week or so.)

The Receiver gallery is a design studio run by Jafon Hakkinen (that’s him at the computer, in the photo at right.) They’ve got a nice show up right now, “The Boy’s Club”, a collective of twelve female Canadian and American illustrators. Some painting and mixed media work… lots of t-shirts, too. I’m starting to notice t-shirts at all the hip new galleries (LOTS of t-shirts at Mollusk – see yesterday’s post.) Everything in the show is up on their web site.

I was particulary impressed with paintings by Korin Faught (left, below) and Karen Silverman (right, below.) They both had portraits in this show but there wasn’t anything in the gallery I didn’t like. Check it out – the show’s up another two weeks.

Images from the Receiver web site:
left -Faught- “Captain Handsome and the Dog Face Boys”
right – Silverman – “Man and Dog”

permanent link to this entry

July 14, 2005 (Thursday) – New Art Space
Yesterday I visited a new gallery space in my neighborhood. It’s in the Mollusk Surf Shop at 4500 Irving Street (at 46th Ave, in San Francisco.) Even though it’s only a few blocks from here, I haven’t been over to that block since the Cajun restaurant closed last year. So I first heard about Mollusk when I read Alan Bamberger’s account of the opening (lots of photos of the art there.)

The space is airy, light, open, with high ceilings and a very relaxed vibe. There’s a small, dedicated exhibit space in the back of the store, but a lot of art is on the wall over the racks of surf boards and behind the cash register.

Bamberger mentioned a Barry McGee painting that had been nailed to the wall, but that’s not the case – the visible nail heads are part of the art work. The piece of art is hung on the wall in the usual way.

My favorite piece in the show was a big painting of sea urchin spines, under a translucent wrap of some sort. It’s beautifully painted, but it’s painted on styrofoam. What happens to styrofoam when it ages? If it lasts, if it doesn’t fall apart in a few years, it’d be a good use of the material.

permanent link to this entry

July 13, 2005 (Wednesday) – A Blogospheric Grid

a super fantastic blogospheric griddy guide for visual thinkers

Photo sources: Allana Spence; Terry Teachout; Antonia Hollander; Carol Es; Carolyn Zick; Caryn Coleman; Charles T. Downey; Chris Hand; Cinque Hicks; Cynthia King; David Byrne; Duane Keiser; Elise Tomlinson; Franklin Einspruch; Rachael Buffington Baldanza; Jack Rasmussen; James Wagner; Joy Garnet; J. T. Kirkland; F. Lennox Campello; Libby Rosof; Marja-Leena Rathje; Mark Barry; Anna L. Conti; John Perreault; Tyler Green; Mark Vallen; Martin Bromirski; Hans Heiner Buhr; Matt Petty ; Gregg Chadwick; Roberta Fallon; Sarah Hromack; Danny Gregory; Todd Gibson; Mat Gleason.

July 12, 2005 (Tuesday) – Advice and Response

Did you ever have to go through this to get the 3D to 2D conversion down? I had a drawing teacher who made us use this method for a while… I still have my frame with the string grid, down in the basement somewhere.

permanent link to this entry
Todd Gibson at From the Floor mentioned the current issue of “Art on Paper”, with its cover story about advice for young artists. He posted seven solid gold items, and the only thing I’d add is – practice every day (with or without the grid.)

James Wagner wrote about the Zipcar, New York’s version of Carshare – joining one of these organizatons is a tip for urban artists. Most of time, public transportation does me just fine. Even when I take my paintings to Almac each month, I usually do it on MUNI. But every now and then, you need to go pick up some really big stretcher bars, or transport a whole bunch of big paintings, or go to a friend’s show in some godforsaken outpost with no public transport. With Carshare, I can rent a pickup truck or a Scion, or a Beetle or whatever for just a few bucks per hour (gas included!)

ArtBusiness guy, Alan Bamberger frequently has advice for artists scattered throughout his reviews of art openings. Here’s a recent sample from June 25th:

Now I’m gonna tell why I ask what some might consider “uninformed” questions like “What happens to it when the show’s over?” or “Do you sell enough to make a living?” or “How long did it take to make?” or “So how do you make money?” One of my main missions in life is to help more artists sell more art better, so that hopefully, one day, they can support themselves entirely by making art and live lives of uncompromising creativity– because that’s what they want to do. To complicate matters, lots of artists don’t have outside jobs (maybe they don’t want ’em; maybe they can’t get ’em), or outside sources of income, enough money to pay next month’s rent, or sometimes even enough money to buy a decent meal. I ask my questions for them, those artists who struggle mightily to survive, on the off chance I might reconfigure an occasional answer to render their struggles a little less mighty. There you go. And thanks for taking the time to answer.

Readers of Working Artist’s Journal sound off:

in response to what you wanted to say:

i think that the free day thing for musuems is culturally responsible but also that charging other days is economically responsible. So, the cost of art is a matter of concern and responsability.

so here’s a thought – what about standardized art pricing – i mean, since the whole thing seems to be getting obviously and blattantly out of hand. The means of pricing are tough to work out but it goes something like an appraisal, giving a reason for each point and justifying it against a standard. I believe that anyone who argues that art is priceless would give it for free (ha-ha), but by the same token would argue for a pricing (ha-ha-ha) if they are trying to sell it (justifiably) I think the field would level out, some prices going up, and others down. Anyhow, i am brainstorming this concept for categories and meters. let you know.


On your weblog you have mentioned the ‘discovery’ of vermeer’s studio by dutch árt historian ‘Daan Hartmann. In holland he is known as a very dubious artdealer and certainly not as a historian of any kind. His alleged find was just a way to direct people to his business (which has been under attack both from banks and the taxman and private citizens for fraud). Details can be found in many dutch newspapers and on several websites and weblogs.

reuters is not always a reliable source…..
(from a Dutch reader)

Your pride (or defensiveness) in your literalness, all too easily reveals your limitations as a visual artist or a commentator.
(from an installation artist)

Hi Anna,
Had a chance this week to check out your blog and your site in general, and wanted to send my compliments! It’s so far-ranging and informative and beautiful. Love your work: the writing and the painting. And thanks for posting my news on Mexico. So far, we have 4-5 folks who want to go, not quite enough, but we’ll see….
All the best,
Marianne Rogoff

(image at top is from a clip art collection called Desk Gallery, by Zedcor, Inc.)

July 11, 2005 (Monday) – An Artist’s View of the City
Yesterday I gave a talk at the Studio Gallery about the artist’s view and the city. (left: Jennifer at the Studio Gallery, making last minute adjustments.) Earlier in the weekend I’d seen a documentary about Richard Avedon (“Darkness and Light”) that gave me an idea of where to begin. At the beginning of the movie Richard Avedon said, “To be an artist (to be a photographer) you have to nurture the things that most people discard. You have to keep them alive, in order to tap them. I have to be in touch with the fragility… the man in me, the woman in me, the things I’m afraid of. By exploring things I’m afraid of, I’ve been able to lay the ghost. It’s out of me and onto the page.”

My interpretation: artists stay open to chance and serendipity. They take the time to slow down, stop, and look at the things most people rush past. It’s part of human nature to look for and recognize patterns, but artists take it a little further.

Visual artists keep a vast personal museum of images in their head. They shuffle through these images constantly. This makes it natural for an artist to look at a pile of litter by the curb and see a beautiful composition, or an interesting juxtaposition of objects, or a symbolic statement, when most people would rush by without seeing it, or see it but dismiss it as “trash.”

The gift of the artist to the rest of the community is to show, point out, or emphasize things they’ve seen. Often this is a familiar scene or subject from an unfamiliar point of view. For instance. Paul Madonna’s ink drawings of San Francisco roof tops have made a whole lot of people start looking up as they walk around the city. (Above left: Madonna drawing from the Newmark Gallery.) Nobuhito Tanaka’s “Mini Mini Cooper” (image right, at the Studio Gallery) shifts the viewer’s point of view, to pavement level.

For the last year or so, I’ve been focusing on urban caves (tunnels, garages, etc.) My point of view has been from a dark place, looking out (or not) towards the opening, and light.

Ultimately, though, the viewer decides on the point of view for each work of art. Mike Nichols said it like this, at the end of the Richard Avedon documentary: “Art doesn’t come to ultimate conclusions. A great work never closes the issue – it leaves things open, undecided, not yet dealt with… things for later, things for us (the viewers) to deal with.”
permanent link to this entry

July 7, 2005 (Thursday) – Getting out of the studio

I’m getting buggy – I haven’t left the studio in over a week, except to sleep & occasionally scrounge in the kitchen. The painting is going well, but I think it’s time to get some fresh air and few UV rays, so I’m heading out to the park to paint today.
– – – – –
I’m impressed with’s entry into the group-blog arena. The writing is good. It’s attractive, lively, covers fluff as well topics like “eat where you live” Even the art category is off to a good start, with Matt Petty doing most of the art reporting.

permanent link to this entry

July 6, 2005 (Wednesday) – Public Art

In respnse to Tyler Green’s Boston Globe op-ed about why it is wrong for the MFA Boston to rent out art to a private gallery in a Las Vegas casino:

Why shouldn’t public (non-profit) art museums rent out their collections? Because for godsake, we’re buried in money exchanges as it is. It takes an extreme act of will and almost constant vigilance to keep oneself from being sucked into the “everything-has-a-price-and-mine-is-higher-than-yours” mentality. Is there no end to the the constant barrage of messages, saying in essence, “you aren’t good enough, but buy this and maybe you can pass?” Look at all the flashing boxes around the borders of most web pages: it’s a virtual walk down any major (US) city center, with panhandlers shaking cups at you, left and right. Aren’t these museum people rich enough already? No, of course not, because money doesn’t fill that hole. Neither does whiter teeth, smaller pores, bigger cars…

OK, you pushed a button, but I’ll stop before I really get carried away. What I wanted to say is:

Admission to PUBLIC art museums, to see PUBLICLY OWNED art should be FREE at all times to everybody (i.e. the PUBLIC.)

permanent link to this entry

July 5, 2005 (Tuesday) – Practice
A few days ago a friend of mine (another painter) dropped by to see what I was up to. I was having trouble deciding which, if any paintings to submit to a particular venue. All of my current work (stacked in the hall and around the living room) is already promised to various places, so it would mean submitting work that was at least two years old. We went down to the basement to pull a few pieces out of the racks and take a look. I hadn’t seen these paintings in quite a while. At first, they almost looked to me like they were painted by another person. I was shocked. I saw all kinds of things I’d do differently today. Yet, at the time I finished these pieces, I thought they were the best I’d ever done.

How can such a short time make such a difference? Especially when I’m not consciously trying to “improve” anything? Each time I work on a painting, I just keep at it until I think it’s as good as it can be. Some are harder than others, but I’m usually satisfied with the result. So why, after a few months go by, does it no longer meet my standards? Because, in some mysterious process, those standards have shifted.

I know it has something to do with practice. Lack of practice can slow, stall, or even reverse the progression of skills. But I also think there’s more to it than just practice. Is it desire, intent, focus, or … ? I don’t know. It’s something to ponder today, while I practice.
permanent link to this entry

July 4, 2005 (Monday) – Fairfield Porter, reality and idealism

From the book, “Poets on Painters,” Edited by J.D. McClatchy
©1988, University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-06971-4

Excerpts from the chapter, “Respect for Things As They Are” by John Ashbery:

In his introduction to Fairfield Porter’s posthumous collection of art criticism, “Art in Its Own Terms,” Rackstraw Downes quotes a remark Fairfield Porter made during what must have been one of the more Byzantine discussions at the Artists’ Club on Eighth Street, around 1952. The members were arguing about whether or not it was vain to sign your paintings. With the flustered lucidity of Alice in the courtroom, Porter sliced this particular Gordian knot once and for all: “If you are vain it is vain to sign your pictures and vain not to sign them. If you are not vain it is not vain to sign them and not vain not to sign them.” We do not know the reaction of his colleagues; quite possibly this mise au net fell on the same deaf ears that ignored the urgent but plain and unpalatable truths that Porter voiced again and again in his writings on art, at a time of particularly hysterical factionalism. … His reputation as an eccentric remains, though it stemmed from a single-minded determination to speak the truth. Handsome is as handsome does; actions speak louder than words: who, in the course of the Artists’ Club’s tumultuous sessions, could pause to listen to such drivel?

I hadn’t known this statement of Porter’s before reading Downes’s preface, but somehow it caused all my memories of the man I knew well for more than twenty years (without, alas, pausing very often to look or listen well) to fall into place. Porter was, of course, only the latest of a series of brilliant know-nothings who at intervals have embodied the American genius, from Emerson and Thoreau to Whitman and Dickinson down to Wallace Stevens and Marianne Moore. Her title “In Distrust of Merits” could stand for all of them and her preference for winter over summer reminds me of Porter’s saying in a letter to a friend: “November after the leaves have fallen may be one of the best times of year on Long Island. That is, I like the way the trees don’t block the light any more. ” And I realized after such a long acquaintanceship that his paintings, which most people like but have difficulty talking about (Are they modern enough? Too French? Too pleasant? Hasn’t this been done before?), are part of the intellectual fabric that underlay his opinions,his conversation, his poetry, his way of being.

They are intellectual in the classic American tradition of the writers mentioned above because they have no ideas in them, that is, no ideas that can be separated from the rest. They are idea, or consciousness, or light, or whatever. Ideas surround them, but do not and cannot extrude themselves into the being of the art… Porter had a horror of “art as sociology,” of the artist who “treats art as though it were raw material for a factory that produces a commodity called understanding.” For art and that commodity are one, and art that illustrates an idea,however remotely or tangentially, has forfeited its claim to be considered art by introducing a fatal divisiveness into what can only be whole. Politically “concerned” artists continue to make pictures that illustrate the horrors of war, of man’s inhumanity to man; feminist artists produce art in which woman is exalted, and imagine that they have accomplished a useful act; and no doubt there are a number of spectators who find it helpful to be reminded that there is room for improvement in the existing order of things. Yet beyond the narrow confmes of the “subject” (only one of a number of equally important elements in the work of art, as
Porter points out) the secret business of art gets done according to mysterious rules of its own. In this larger context ideology simply doesn’t function as it is supposed to, when indeed it isn’t directly threatening the work of art by trivializing it, and trivializing as well the importance of the ideas it seeks to dramatize.

As a citizen he was preoccupied – almost obsessed, in fact – with questions of ecology and politics, and politics of a most peculiar sort; he had been something of a Marxist in the thirties but in later life his political pronouncements could veer from far left to extreme right without any apparent transition. And in conversation he could become almost violent on subjects like pesticides or fluoridation, to the extent that his friends would sometimes: stifle giggles or groans, though one almost always had to agree with him, and the years since his death in 1975 have proved him even righter than he knew. Nevertheless, this passionately idealistic man felt threatened by idealism. If I understand him, it is not idealism that is dangerous, far from it, but idealism perverted and destroyed by being made “useful.” Its uselessness is something holy, just like Porter’s pictures, barren of messages and swept clean, in many cases, by the clean bare light of November, no longer masked by the romantic foliage.

In an earlier letter to Mrs. White, Porter complained about several sentences in an article she had written about him and submitted to him before publication. One was:”Since he does not like the white, misty summer light of the Hamptons he goes to an island in Maine in the summer.” This nettled him because: “the fact is, we go to Maine in the summer because I have since I was six. It is my home more than any other place, and I belong there. . . . The white misty light would never be a reason for my doing anything.” And no doubt the suggestion that he would travel to paint in a place where the light was better was inconceivable, since the whole point was to put down what was there wherever he happened to be, not with approval but with respect. Another sentence that Porter objected to in Mrs. White’s article was this: “The Porters are quiet, intense and rather fey and seem to live on an enchanted planet of their own.” He did not give a reason for his objection, and perhaps none was necessary. But Mrs. White could not really be blamed for her assessment; there was an element of truth in it despite the discomfort it caused Porter. His house in Southampton was an enchanting place: large and gracious but always a little messy and charmingly dilapidated. One of the bathrooms was more than that, while in an upstairs hall the wallpaper hung in festoons and no one seemed to mind. The children were strangely beautiful, wide-eyed, and withdrawn, and they spoke like adults. There were idiosyncratically chosen paintings by de Kooning, Larry Rivers, and Leon Hartl (a little known artist whom Porter admired enormously) on the walls, along with Audubon and Ukiyo-e prints and a strange Turner drawing; there was a lovely smell in the house, made up of good cooking, oil paint, books, and fresh air from the sea. He painted his surroundings as they looked, and they happened to look cozy. But the coziness is deceiving. The local color is transparent and porous, letting the dark light of space show through. The painting has the vehemence of abstraction, though it speaks another language.

In the same letter Porter quoted from memory a line of Wittgenstein that he felt central to his own view of aesthetics: “Every sentence is in order as it is.” And he went on astonishingly to elaborate: “Order seems to come from searching for disorder, and awkwardness from searching for harmony or likeness, or the following of a system. The truest order is what you already find there, or that will be given if you don’t try for it. When you arrange, you fail. ” I think it is in the light of statements like these that we must now look at Porter’s painting, prepared to find the order that is already there, not the one that should be but the one that is.

permanent link to this entry
From the book, “Poets on Painters,” Edited by J.D. McClatchy
©1988, University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-06971-4

Image of Porter is a self portrait from; painting of girl on front of mirror is from Yale Press; painting of “Breakfast” is from

permanent link to this entry

July 1, 2005 (Friday) – July shows to see
The summer fog has settled in, out here by the ocean. I haven’t seen a ray of sunshine in over a week (except for Tuesday, and that was because I went over to the Mission for most of the day.) I’m still working on the July calendar and I’ll try to post it later today. These look like pretty good picks:
Braunstein/Quay Gallery
Paul Pratchenko, Paintings, mixed media
July 6–July 30, 2005
Reception: July 9, 2005

Elins Eagles-Smith Gallery
Pia Stern , “Gravity,” New work on canvas and paper
July 7 – August 15, 2005
Reception first thursday (July 7th) 5:30 – 7:30

Feast day paintings

Presented for your reflection.
Click on painting to go to artist’s site (source of the image.)

At left:
Katherine Doyle

At left:
Hein Koh
At right:
John Currin

At right:
Frank Wright
permanent link to this entry
November 23, 2005 (Wednesday) – Ruth Asawa sculptures at de Young

Ruth Asawa is an example of what it means to be an artist. She’s one of the most inspiring examples we have. She has used her talents, training and life experience to enrich her community, and certainly most of the people in San Francisco are grateful for her presence here. I’ve been thinking about her body of work (artworks as well as activism) since seeing her hanging wire sculptures at the de Young recently.

There is a big team whenever there are new Altcoins that emerge and their projects. Mostly the team that they have make use of their nicknames rather than real name and present themselves on the website. When the project takes off and it does not make much money, it is probably going to fade off very soon because its chance of developing over time is not going to happen. On the other hand when it raises a lot of money, it will have investor who will be buying coins on the exchanges. Bitcoin Trader also helps trade Altcoins.

The 15 works are made of copper, brass or Montel wire and are crocheted or hand-woven. They hang in the vestibule of the tower, casting reticular shadows against the concrete walls. One of her untitled circular tree pieces (I think of them as tree mandalas) is mounted against one wall. If you’ve lived in San Francisco any length of time, you’ve certainly seen one or more of her fountains or sculptures and heard about her work with local school children. Sometimes I wonder why we hear so much about young artists who act like (are treated like) rock stars, when there are artists like Ruth Asawa quietly working in their communities, year after year. There must be many more like her, out there in other towns around the country. I hope they’re valued by their communities.

In case you’re new in town, or reading this from elsewhere, here are some links about Ruth Asawa:

Her own, excellent, comprehensive webpage, with great scrapbook photos.

An upcoming show (December 1, 2005 – January 14, 2006 – Sculpture and drawings) at Rena Bransten Gallery

A story from the November ’05 Noe Valley Voice (Asawa’s neighborhood paper.)

KQED’s recent Spark video (downloadable) about Asawa and her influences.

Her exhibit 3 years ago at the Oakland Museum.

A DVD documentary about Ruth Asawa